funny_expatHey all
Is three days enough time to properly visit Belgium?
I am arriving in Brussels from London via the Eurostar on the 20th and I was thinking about spending three days here. I am considering doing one day in Brussels and then splitting the rest between Ghent and Bruges but I am not sure if that is a 'silly' idea
Accepted answer
cocoa_lover_ukThree days is definitely enough to see the big highlights! You can do Brussels and then one day trip like Bruges or Ghent. Just dont try to do both Ghent and Bruges in one day because you will be exhausted and wont have time to actually eat any chocolate. Usually 5 days is the standard for first timers to see Bruges, Ghent, Brussels, and Antwerp. If you want to relax and see Wallonia or the Ardennes then 7 days is the sweet spot.
Haha_BelgiumMaybe. Staying in Ghent actually gives you a much better atmosphere and way more to see than staying in Brussels. I think the vibe there is WAY better for a short trip
NotSoSure_92Last year I went to Bruges and it was alright but Ghent is way more authentic and relaxed. Bruges felt way too busy with all the crowds for me !
been_there_done_thatMaybe look into staying in Ghent for the whole trip... It is much less hassle to just take the trains from there to other cities since they run so frequently... It saves you from moving your luggage around constantly!
travel_bud2I actually think two days is sufficient if you just focus on one city or maybe just a pair like Bruges and Ghent. I spent a weekend just doing those two and it was plenty for me. I didnt feel like I missed much else besides the museums
bruges_woodworkStaying overnight in Bruges at least is a must. It is lovely once all the big tourist groups have left for the evening. Best way to see the real town.
Cheers